"Free market" does not mean free of regulation. . .

| No Comments

The term "free market" does not mean free of regulation. It means free of government interference, that is, legal plunder and other official aggressive force. ~ Reason Magazine


The Free Market Doesn't Need Government Regulation
Bureaucrats regulate by threat of physical force while the market operates peacefully through millions of cooperating participants.

by Sheldon Richman
August 5, 2012

What's overlooked--intentionally or not--is that the alternative to a government-regulated economy is not an unregulated one. As a matter of fact, "unregulated economy," like square circle, is a contradiction in terms. If it's truly unregulated it's not an economy, and if it's an economy, it's not unregulated. The term "free market" does not mean free of regulation. It means free of government interference, that is, legal plunder and other official aggressive force.

Ludwig von Mises and F. A. Hayek pointed out years ago that the real issue regarding economic planning is not: To plan or not to plan? But rather: Who plans (centralized state officials or decentralized private individuals in the market)?

Likewise, the question is not: to regulate or not to regulate. It is, rather, who (or what) regulates?

Read the rest here.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Anthony Bradley published on August 5, 2012 11:13 AM.

It's actually not "a gospel" issue nor is it about "Jesus," is it? was the previous entry in this blog.

Why most blacks tend to vote for democrats? is the next entry in this blog.

Ant.jpg

ANTHONY BRADLEY, PH.D.
Executive Editor
@drantbradley

Jasper.png

JASPER ABBOTT, J.D.
Senior Contributor
@jasperabbott

Shawn.png

SHAWN REED, M.A.
Contributor

smallAb.jpg

ABRAHAM SANGHA
Contributor

ChrisS.png

CHRIS SCHAEFER
Contributor
@ChrisSchaef