June 16, 2008

America's Fat Kids

fat kids.jpg
(In the 1950s, kids had three cups of milk for every cup of soda. Today that ratio is reversed, meaning they get all the calories and none of the nutrients.
Photo-illustration by Anne Elliott Cutting for TIME)

What does it say about parents if their kids are overweight (with the exception of those with medical conditions that may lead to obesity).

Time Magazine has an amazingly sad article about America's pathetically fat kids. I think I might even start saying stuff to folks in public because obesity and overeating are increasing America's health care costs.

In 1900 the average weight of a college-age male in the U.S. was 133 lb. (60 kg); the average woman was 122 lb. (55 kg). By 2000, men had plumped up to 166 lb. (75 kg) and women to 144 lb. (65 kg). And while the small increase in average height for men (women have remained the same) accounts for a bit of that, our eating habits are clearly responsible for most. Over the past 20 years in particular, we've stuffed ourselves like pâté geese. In 1985 there were only eight states in which more than 10% of the adult population was obese--though the data collection then was admittedly spottier than it is now. By 2006, there were no states left in which the obesity rates were that low, and in 23 states, the number exceeded 25%. Even those figures don't tell the whole story, since they include only full-blown obesity. Overall, about two-thirds of all Americans weigh more than they should.

"Sit down on a bench in a park with a person on either side of you," says Penelope Slade-Royall, director of the U.S. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. "If you're not overweight, statistically speaking, both of the other people sitting with you are."

If there was any fire wall against the fattening of American adults, it was American kids. The quick metabolism and prodigious growth spurts of childhood make it a challenge just to keep up with all the calories you need, never mind exceed them. But even the most active kids could not hold out forever against the storm of food coming at them every day. In 1971 only 4% of 6-to-11-year-old kids were obese; by 2004, the figure had leaped to 18.8%. In the same period, the number rose from 6.1% to 17.4% in the 12-to-19-year-old group, and from 5% to 13.9% among kids ages just 2 to 5. And as with adults, that's just obesity. Include all overweight kids, and a whopping 32% of all American children now carry more pounds than they should. "There's no way to overestimate how scary numbers like this are," says Seeley.

Obese boys and girls are already starting to develop the illnesses of excess associated with people in their 40s and beyond: heart disease, liver disease, diabetes, gallstones, joint breakdown and even brain damage as fluid accumulation inside the skull leads to headaches, vision problems and possibly lower IQs.

Fellas, what should we do?

Posted by anthony at June 16, 2008 7:32 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Anthony,
The fathers of these kids should be locked up for allowing their kids to suffer like this, this is child abuse. Sadly most of the fathers have no idea how to shoot a jump shot unless it is on a screen and it means pressing the "X" button. The only "exercise" they get is running after the ice cream man for a choco taco.

It is on the men to lead out, to stop sitting in front of the TV, pick up a ball, put down the remote, eat some vegetables and no the lettuce on a Whopper does not count, and lead out their families in working towards a healthier lifestyle!

Los

Posted by: Carlos Griego at June 16, 2008 10:30 AM

obesity is a function of greater wealth. It's not good, or justified, it's just a fact.

Life expectancy is also at an all-time high. Intriguing.

Posted by: shawn at June 16, 2008 3:30 PM

Prosperity helps people get fat, and there's also the issue that we're taller than we were in the 1950s. Better diet is a culprit for both.

That said, shooting the 'ol idiot box ain't a bad idea, either.

Posted by: Bike Bubba at June 16, 2008 3:43 PM

Wealth makes you fat. A lot of wealth makes you skinny again. how 'bout them apples?

http://www.obesityinamerica.org/PDF/obesitytrends.pdf

Posted by: Chas at June 16, 2008 3:47 PM

chas...exactly, well said.

Posted by: shawn at June 16, 2008 4:01 PM

Snort drugs!

they make u do better in school, less distracted, give you more energy, produce more, and they take away ur appetite... big time.

They are called Ritalin and Adderall

less appetite, more movement equals Thinner People!
its great

Posted by: Stork at June 18, 2008 5:48 PM

ah, drugs...is there anything they CAN'T do???

Posted by: Chas at June 18, 2008 8:11 PM

hmm. how long after a drug has been out does the anti-drug bias wear out?

Posted by: shawn at June 20, 2008 7:48 PM

If the drugs work there isnt any anti-drug bias. The anti drug bias comes from its abuse. No intelligent person is against drugs per se... its their potential for abuse and its the docs that are heavily invested in the Pharm CO's, hence higher # of prescriptions, that make drugs repulsive. I could go on... but I forgot to take my meds and I cant remember what I was going to say... :(

Posted by: Stork at June 23, 2008 3:18 AM

I half wonder if a shot of espresso would be a good substitute for the powerful stimulants like Ritalin.

(yes, it's true; the treatment for true ADHD is to put the kid on speed)

Or maybe a TV diet (nothing after 8pm, say) and a good night's sleep might be called for. Nah, why try virtue when you can have better living through chemistry?

Posted by: Bike Bubba at June 23, 2008 1:56 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?