September 23, 2007

Tuscaloosa, Jena 6: Why Evangelicals Continue to have ZERO credibility on the issues of race

crickets.jpgart.sharpton.thu.ap.jpg (Al Sharpton on the right)

We are perhaps in the midst of the greatest race/civil-rights clash of the decade and what are we hearing from "evangelical leaders": crickets.

(1) Tuscaloosa, Alabama is in the midst of a massive white resegregation (rezoning of blacks) battle and when I survey the news for evangelicals in the area to offer some leadership there's nothing. This story is international. This may be a Supreme Court case.

(2) Jena, Louisiana--there are THOUSANDS of blacks protesting about the 6 boys accused of attempted murder because they beat up a white kid.

So far, the traditional black church is super involved. Evangelicals? There are talks that this will launch this century's "civil-rights" movement. I've been searching web-sites to see what white evangelical leaders are saying and telling their congregations and what have I heard so far: crickets. This reminds us of the 1950s and 1960s when evangelicals provided no leadership during the real civil-rights movement.

Many African Americans charted buses to go down and protest.

Crickets. Too bad the Jena 6 debate isn't about abortion or N.T. Wright some would say.

This is an opportune time for evangelicalism to broaden its reach. I personally believe that both of these conflicts should be mediated, in the social dimensions and tensions, by the church.

There is no better institution to mediate the social ramifications of these issues for their local neighborhoods than the church. The church speaks truth to culture and points it to redemption, restoration, and reconciliation.

Crickets.

I seriously doubt that most (if any) of you all (unless you were in a black church) even prayed about these issues on Sunday. But that's probably true for Darfur and Burma as well.

Crickets.

At least one black evangelical is saying something. Rev. Lance Lewis offers some perspective. Whew.

BTW, Sunday at 11:00am is NOT the most segregated hour in America. This is kind'a silly if you think about it sociologically. The most racially segregated hours in America are everyday between 3:00pm and 7:00am, when everyone retreats back to their racially segregated shires--marriages, families, neighborhoods, etc. Sunday at 11:00am is only a reflection of how people live life Monday through Saturday. Don't believe the Sunday 11:00am myth.

Maybe this is why Jena 6 is "out-of-sight-out-of-mind." I dunno?

Posted by anthony at September 23, 2007 10:17 PM | TrackBack
Comments

The cynic in me wonders who my "evangelical leaders" are anyway - and would I trust them with my "voice." It also wonders whether or not the Jena debacle is held at arms length because hate beget violence - and while a gross injustice was occurring there's a belief (true or not) that when such a thing comes to light it (the situation) will be rectified.

The bigger picture is that the events in Jena and Tuscaloosa are happening at all. What route has taken us there and has the church been active in countering them before they took place?

Also Anthony, folks other than you do care about this and have brought it to the attention of others. Don't let the cynic in you dismiss the rest of the body wholesale. Do these events need further attention? Of course yes, but quips about abortion and N.T. Wright don't help - because they're both horrid and divisive as well.

I continue to be encouraged by your posts, so keep them coming. btw, thanks for the link to Rev. Lance – as you come across more, please share. If you know of an “evangelical response” – let us know of that as well.

Peace.

Posted by: stelmodad at September 24, 2007 07:46 AM

Stelmo, said "The bigger picture is that the events in Jena and Tuscaloosa are happening at all. What route has taken us there and has the church been active in countering them before they took place?"

Great question.

Posted by: Anthony at September 24, 2007 08:46 AM

Jason Whitlock makes the same argument as stelmodad.

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/columnists/jason_whitlock/story/284511.html

This is good stuff.

Posted by: Keith at September 24, 2007 01:55 PM

Keith, excellent, excellent article. Where do you all find this good stuff?

Posted by: stelmodad at September 24, 2007 02:11 PM

An aside: my husband went to Burma/Myanmar under the radar to train church planters. It is so incredibly poor there, the people have no cars, but the military dictatorship drives around in SUVs, Navigators and such. The people make something around 50 cents a week, and the whole family will share one toothbrush, not knowing when they might get one new one. When he was there, we had to be careful in our e-mails, the government listens. Su-Ki (not sure of spelling) has been languishing under house arrest for years. She was elected president years ago, then the military government wouldn't step down and let her lead, put her under arrest. There is a growing underground church there, very undercover. About the Jena 6 happenings, I think it would have been such a wonderful testimony if both the local white and black churches in that community had gotten together over this issue, rather that having Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton spearheading this thing. I don't know if their presence, and the march will have much long-term effect on that community. That's definitly where the local churches are needed to make the difference.

Posted by: t.smith at September 24, 2007 04:28 PM

I can see hesitation to speak on two grounds. First, it can be said that the system is working; convictions are overturned on appeal, prosecutors are scouring the law for "is this a crime," people are seriously looking at the new school district maps, and more. Can we seriously argue that this would have happened, say, in 1965 without the National Guard being involved? There is still progress to be made, but isn't this huge?

Another big reason is quite frankly the Al & Jesse factor. Sometimes they get it right, but how many good people have had their lives trashed by Al & Jesse? If you want people to keep quiet, telling people they're bigots when they disagree with you is a great way of doing it.

Posted by: Robert Perry at September 24, 2007 06:30 PM

Thanks Prof. Bradley. Very thoughtful and honest (as usual). I really enjoy readig what you say. As I stated before, maybe I will grow up and be like you. LOL. But to the point, it is sad that not one "popular" pastor has spoken out or up against this. I at least though Ligon Duncan would since it is only a few miles down the road (well not that close).

Posted by: Lionel Woods at September 24, 2007 09:54 PM

I thought that the article on this topic at Chuck Colson's Breakpoint was good:
http://www.breakpoint.org/listingarticle.asp?ID=7105

Posted by: Westy at September 26, 2007 01:41 PM

Pastor Bradley,

I've noticed a knee-jerk penchant for blacks to blame whites in any instance of inter-racial conflict, and the Jena Six is just another example.

The charges for these boys (2nd degree attempted murder) fit the crimes in the definition of the law. I don't know how much experience you have with physical combat, but when someone is punched from behind and attacked while unconscious by six people, it's attempted murder. The severity of the victim's injuries afterward are really immaterial. Say, for example, that someone shoots at you and misses. Should the attacker just be charged with something other than attempted murder because you are unharmed?

What, in your estimation, should white evangelical leaders say in response to this? While we're at it, where have black church leaders been with regards to the fact that black-on-white crime is 50 times more prevalent than white-on-black crime? Could the high black crime rate be the reason for white self-segregation?

Posted by: PRCalDude at September 27, 2007 04:49 PM

YOu racist!!!

Get the HELLL OF THIS BORED!!!!

Posted by: Phil M at September 27, 2007 09:36 PM

Are you directing your comments at me, Phil? You know, insults are the most graceless way to state that you've lost an argument:
http://www.city-journal.org/html/6_2_my_black.html

Posted by: PRCalDude at September 28, 2007 11:19 AM

PRCalDude, Relax. Phil M is being sarcastic. You two have more in common than you'd (or probably he'd) like to know.

Posted by: Bianca at September 28, 2007 05:24 PM

Oh. Heh. Sorry, Phil!

Sarcasm is so hard to detect online if you're not used to reading someone's comments.

Posted by: PRCalDude at September 28, 2007 06:17 PM

I AINT BEING SARSASIC!!!!

THAT RASIST CLOWN COME ONE HERE SPREDDING LIE RASIST LIES ABOUT BALCK FOLKS BEING MORE VIOLENT THAN WHITE PEOPLE LIKE 50 TIMES MORE VIOLET!!!!

THAT IS A RASIST LIE!!!

ANTHONY NEED TO BAN HIS RASIST LYING ASS FROM THIE BORED!!!

Posted by: Phil M at September 28, 2007 09:23 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?